TokenInsight

Log In

RATING METHODOLOGY >

TokenInsight’s rating system is widely accepted by several leading investment firms, including Matrix Partners China, Susquehanna International Group (SIG), Draper Dragon, Fenbushi Capital. We are dedicated towards providing accurate cryptocurrency ratings based on risk and quality in order to help investors and institutions to reduce liabilities and make more intelligent financial decisions.
Get Rating >

RATING UPDATE

more >

RATED LIST(321) RATING CANDIDATE
* Original Order: The projects with rating reports are shown preferentially and then ranked in order of descending market value.
Rating Description:
AAA
The technical foundation is extremely solid, the status of operations is extremely stable, the extent of influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors is extremely small, and risk is extremely low.
AA
The technical foundation is very solid, the status of operations is very stable, the extent of influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors is very small, and risk is very low.
A
The technical foundation is solid, the status of operations is stable, the extent of influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors is relatively small, and risk is relatively low.
BBB
Technical feasibility is very good, the status of operations is stable, influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors exists to a certain extent, and risk is controllable.
BB
Technical feasibility is good, the status of operations is relatively stable, the possibility of influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors exists to a relatively large extent, and risk is basically controllable.
B
Technical feasibility is moderate, the status of operations is relatively stable, the possibility of influence on the project by unfavourable changes in the environment or uncertain factors exists to a very large extent, and risk is to a definitely limited extent controllable.
CCC
The technical foundation or idea has certain problems, the application scenarios are limited, the project is susceptible to influence by uncertain factors, both internal and external, and has relatively large risk.
CC
The technical foundation or idea has considerable problems, and application scenarios are highly limited, which makes for a project that has few internal or external factors to consider in the context of sound development, and carries a very large risk.
C
The technical foundation or idea has substantial problems, and lacks deliberation upon possible application scenarios. The token has almost no usage value, and the project suffers from extremely large risk.
D
The project is riddled with problems and carries an extremely high risk of failure.
FOR ENTERPRISES
  • PROJECTS
  • WALLETS
  • EXCHANGES
  • MINING POOLS
  • OTHERS
Types of Cooperation
Submit